11-27-2022, 09:52 PM
Pete
All results correct.
It's not like I only have one separate expression and can use a function procedure. What I have given is just a fragment of a much longer mammatic formula and I cannot use the proposed function just like that. Someone wrote that the new operator is unnecessary because someone wrote the procedure. And why write procedures, if you can type three or four letters of the operator's name. It is also good to undermine the sense of existence: ABS, INT, etc., since it can be replaced by a functional procedure. Life must be made easier. Hence my proposal of a new operator.
Chris
All results correct.
It's not like I only have one separate expression and can use a function procedure. What I have given is just a fragment of a much longer mammatic formula and I cannot use the proposed function just like that. Someone wrote that the new operator is unnecessary because someone wrote the procedure. And why write procedures, if you can type three or four letters of the operator's name. It is also good to undermine the sense of existence: ABS, INT, etc., since it can be replaced by a functional procedure. Life must be made easier. Hence my proposal of a new operator.
Chris