better error trapping?
#2
You can emulate the try/catch by setting up a block with an "on error goto". A try catch would be quite nice, though. Even if it means it will be _TRY _CATCH..... blegh.... Thank God for $NOPREFIX.

Something I just thought about, though, would be that you'd only be catching exceptions that QB64 runtime throws. It wouldn't be useful for someone like me, who uses external libraries and wouldn't have the ability to catch exceptions from the libraries in this way. I'd have to stick to if statements and GetLastError instead.
Ask me about Windows API and maybe some Linux stuff
Reply


Messages In This Thread
better error trapping? - by madscijr - 01-06-2023, 06:57 PM
RE: better error trapping? - by SpriggsySpriggs - 01-06-2023, 08:07 PM
RE: better error trapping? - by madscijr - 01-06-2023, 09:29 PM
RE: better error trapping? - by SpriggsySpriggs - 01-06-2023, 09:42 PM
RE: better error trapping? - by madscijr - 01-07-2023, 03:34 AM
RE: better error trapping? - by mnrvovrfc - 01-06-2023, 11:22 PM
RE: better error trapping? - by mnrvovrfc - 01-07-2023, 03:38 AM
RE: better error trapping? - by madscijr - 01-08-2023, 03:59 AM
RE: better error trapping? - by aurel - 01-08-2023, 09:11 AM
RE: better error trapping? - by mnrvovrfc - 01-08-2023, 09:50 AM
RE: better error trapping? - by Fifi - 01-09-2023, 11:25 AM
RE: better error trapping? - by aurel - 01-08-2023, 04:09 PM
RE: better error trapping? - by bplus - 01-08-2023, 04:19 PM
RE: better error trapping? - by aurel - 01-08-2023, 05:18 PM
RE: better error trapping? - by bplus - 01-08-2023, 06:29 PM
RE: better error trapping? - by DSMan195276 - 01-08-2023, 06:33 PM



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)