02-11-2023, 05:24 AM
Thank you for this. But I don't mean to offend when I say the following.
I was going to say I wouldn't go near a site named like "file-dot-eye-oh" which might as well be a shrouded address like "bit-dot-lie". In my previous log-in I wrote it but then escaped, thought it was unfair.
Now I could get into the other site that you chose to download your program. However some people are a bit touchy about downloading an executable file, and not everybody is on Windows, and not everybody using Linux has Wine. I'm not in the mood to install a virus scanner on any OS and I speak for other people who might be more insulting about this. At least you decided not to involve the EXE into a ZIP file like is too often the case with someone who wants to celebrate how many times "my stuff" was downloaded.
This is not a recommendation for you to show off the source code or any other part of it. But there are doubts about your using QB64(PE) for all of it or at least half of it. Because somebody else could join this forum and do the same thing you did.
One of the moderators could reveal: What is the best way for a person to prove the executable was created with QB64(PE), without having to show anything about the inner workings?
I didn't hide the above commentary into "spoiler" button because it's only a critical opinion, nothing to be upset about.
I was going to say I wouldn't go near a site named like "file-dot-eye-oh" which might as well be a shrouded address like "bit-dot-lie". In my previous log-in I wrote it but then escaped, thought it was unfair.
Now I could get into the other site that you chose to download your program. However some people are a bit touchy about downloading an executable file, and not everybody is on Windows, and not everybody using Linux has Wine. I'm not in the mood to install a virus scanner on any OS and I speak for other people who might be more insulting about this. At least you decided not to involve the EXE into a ZIP file like is too often the case with someone who wants to celebrate how many times "my stuff" was downloaded.
This is not a recommendation for you to show off the source code or any other part of it. But there are doubts about your using QB64(PE) for all of it or at least half of it. Because somebody else could join this forum and do the same thing you did.
One of the moderators could reveal: What is the best way for a person to prove the executable was created with QB64(PE), without having to show anything about the inner workings?
I didn't hide the above commentary into "spoiler" button because it's only a critical opinion, nothing to be upset about.