Either QB64pe enhancement or IDGI
#6
(07-04-2023, 02:01 AM)mnrvovrfc Wrote: Steered off the road again...

Welp, works on Windows I guess but not for Linux. One major irritation about Linux is that many terminals are limited to a grand total of 255 figures for the command line. "xargs" could be used in some places, but not all.

I have to look into what is done by Purebasic because it might break down only to the two main GUI toolkits which are GTK and Qt. A lot of apps are still on GTK2, many of them are clunky and so many users don't like it. But GTK4, Qt5 and Qt6 require a lot of disk space although they don't seem to conflict with each other.

I don't think I could ever create an app that relies on dragon drop.

Not really off road.  The main subject was Drag-n-Drop.  Linux was never a windows wanna-be ever.  It was a free GUI based on Unix O/S.  Not knowing the limits and differences leads to all kinds of trouble.  Many apps are almost the same between Apple IOS and Android.  I know for a fact a good chunk of the code ports over with no change.  It's the other bits that are hell.  I know of a couple Android apps much better than Apple.  And vice-a-versa.  It all in taking advantage of O/S tools and work a rounds needed.

BTW, Dbox I already used both.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Either QB64pe enhancement or IDGI - by doppler - 07-03-2023, 02:26 PM
RE: Either QB64pe enhancement or IDGI - by dbox - 07-03-2023, 06:03 PM
RE: Either QB64pe enhancement or IDGI - by doppler - 07-04-2023, 10:16 AM
RE: Either QB64pe enhancement or IDGI - by dbox - 07-04-2023, 01:50 PM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)