Quickie.
Would there be an advantage to compile QB64 source using -Ofast or -Os just for speed or size. I see by test times posted, Ofast or Os would be better. But is it better for QB64 source ? The IDE, and compiler (bas) output parts. Is the real question. If it's only a second or two, there is no advantage.
Thoughts ?
Would there be an advantage to compile QB64 source using -Ofast or -Os just for speed or size. I see by test times posted, Ofast or Os would be better. But is it better for QB64 source ? The IDE, and compiler (bas) output parts. Is the real question. If it's only a second or two, there is no advantage.
Thoughts ?