You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved]
#11
(10-14-2022, 05:22 AM)Pete Wrote: Hi Matt,

I've already modified the code to the SELECT CASE snippet I posted, which solved the slow down the h = SCREEN() created. I do have a backup copy of the one with the speed killing situation. No, $CHECKING:OFF does nothing to offset the decreased speed issue in the backup copy with the speed reduction problem.

h, btw is an integer, defined by a DEFINT H-K at the top of the program.

Pete

Thanks for trying Smile I'll have to give it some more thinking. Unfortunately on my machine just putting that logic into a loop (with some dummy types to make it compile) comes out with it running slightly faster if you store the value in
h
rather than use
SCREEN()
three times (as you originally assumed would be the case).

I'm not sure this is what you're doing, but I would note that the usage of
h
gets more expensive if it's in a
SUB
or
FUNCTION
and you're constantly calling it - there's some allocation overhead that goes on for
h
every time you enter the
SUB
or
FUNCTION
it is declared in. This is also a notable difference from
SELECT CASE
, as the internal variable that stores the value you're selecting on (to do the comparisons with each
CASE
) does not get allocated the same way and thus does not have that overhead. None of my testing on this can get close to a 5x slowdown though  Undecided
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by DSMan195276 - 10-14-2022, 06:39 AM



Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)