You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved]

Linear Mode

You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved]

TerryRitchie Offline

Offline

8-bit Enthusiast

Posts: 593
Threads: 44
Joined: Apr 2022
Reputation: 43

#25

10-15-2022, 05:01 AM

(10-15-2022, 04:11 AM)Pete Wrote: What worries me the most is from this point on, no one will take me seriously. Oh wait, when did I ever want anyone to take me seriously? No worries, I'm golden!

Thanks Terry,

Pete

Nah, I know I've referred to your code a number of times to figure out how to get something done, especially in SCREEN 0. And more than once you've corrected/added to my code to make it better. Hell, I even saw Clippy compliment your code once!

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by Pete - 10-13-2022, 09:34 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Kernelpanic - 10-13-2022, 11:41 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 02:20 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by mnrvovrfc - 10-14-2022, 12:21 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by JRace - 10-14-2022, 02:43 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 03:06 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SMcNeill - 10-14-2022, 04:33 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by DSMan195276 - 10-14-2022, 04:41 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 05:22 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by DSMan195276 - 10-14-2022, 06:39 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 05:50 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SMcNeill - 10-14-2022, 07:57 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SpriggsySpriggs - 10-14-2022, 01:53 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 05:55 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SMcNeill - 10-14-2022, 07:15 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by DSMan195276 - 10-14-2022, 09:34 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 07:25 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by TerryRitchie - 10-14-2022, 08:33 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 08:51 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by SMcNeill - 10-14-2022, 10:01 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 09:49 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! - by TerryRitchie - 10-15-2022, 03:38 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by Pete - 10-14-2022, 10:44 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by Pete - 10-15-2022, 04:11 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by TerryRitchie - 10-15-2022, 05:01 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by Pete - 10-15-2022, 05:12 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by TerryRitchie - 10-15-2022, 05:28 AM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by TerryRitchie - 10-15-2022, 05:52 PM

RE: You'd think this would be faster, but NO!!!!!! [Resolved] - by Pete - 10-15-2022, 06:16 PM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)